welcome购彩大厅赔率|welcome购彩大厅交流群

来源：welcome购彩大厅漏洞2021-07-02 17:48

welcome购彩大厅赔率

人民卫生出版社两本妇产科新书首发并向西部省区赠书******

　　光明网讯（记者邱晓琴）12月29日-30日，第七届全国妇产科疾病与优生科学论坛暨第六届广东省妊娠期危重症管理高峰论坛在广东省中山市举办。期间，人民卫生出版社两本妇产科新书《妊娠期高血压疾病》（第2版）、《产科临床手册》首发，并举行赠书仪式，向西部地区十一省区及基层医护工作者赠送4万余册。

人民卫生出版社两本妇产科新书首发并向西部省区赠书

《妊娠期高血压疾病》书影

人民卫生出版社两本妇产科新书首发并向西部省区赠书

《产科临床手册》书影

　　据介绍，《妊娠期高血压疾病》（第2版）一书由余艳红教授和杨慧霞教授主审，苟文丽教授和张为远教授主编，为广大的产科医生、医学生、临床研究生提供了妊娠期高血压疾病翔实且与时俱进的系列知识。《产科临床手册》一书由苟文丽教授主审，蔺莉教授、赵扬玉教授主编，主要围绕“围产保健内容、产科常见合并症、妊娠特有并发症”三个亚专科领域进行阐述，注重临床实际操作的规范化培训。

　　人民卫生出版社有限公司副总编辑杨晋编审认为，《妊娠期高血压疾病》（第2版）对妊娠高血压疾病的流行病学、病因和发病机制、诊疗和预防等方面进行了全面详细地阐述，正如马丁院士在本书序言中所言，这是我国产科领域的“全、新、力、作”。《产科临床手册》则突出便携、重点、精简的特色，注重临床操作，紧贴临床实践，并附有临床操作视频，尽力满足一线产科医生实际需求。“作为‘中国优生科学西部行’项目内容之一，这两本书将赠送给西部地区十一省区及基层医护工作者。”杨晋编审说。

　　据了解，“中国优生科学西部行”项目是中国优生科学协会“促进西部人口健康与优生”工作的重要项目之一，自2013年开始，每五年一个周期，通过组织专题学术讲座、专家查房、专家义诊、手术以及健康教育资料发放等形式，为推动我国西部地区优生科学和妇幼事业发展作贡献。此次新书发布会，中国优生科学协会再次携手西部十一省，赠出新书，将宝贵的临床经验和前沿技术送到基层一线。

　　“在西部行的过程中我们发现，妊娠期高血压疾病是西部某些地区孕产妇和围产儿死亡的首要原因，产科诊疗操作不够规范、知识理念落后，是影响医疗质量的重要原因。为此，我们决定组织全国著名产科专家共同编写《妊娠期高血压疾病》（第2版）及《产科临床手册》。”西安交通大学第一附属医院苟文丽教授介绍了创作两本书的初衷，并对全国70多位产科专家等人士为书籍所做的贡献表示感谢。

　　据悉，本次论坛由中国优生科学协会妇儿临床分会、生殖道疾病诊治分会、广东省妇幼保健协会高危妊娠管理专业委员会、妊娠合并内科疾病专业委员会共同举办。新书发布和赠书仪式后，论坛邀请全国各地的妇产科专家汇聚云端，畅聊妇产科疾病与妊娠期危重症管理的前沿热点，分享临床罕见疑难病例，探讨专业领域难点问题，为全国各地的妇产医护人员献上近50场干货满满的学术讲座。

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.